Various theories on citizenship

Various theories on citizenship | Sociology Optional for UPSC Civil Services Examination | Triumph IAS

Slums and Deprivation in Urban Areas

Various theories on citizenship

Relevant for Sociology Optional for Civil Service Examination.

Relevance : Sociology Paper -1
Unit – Polity & Society

Various theories on citizenship

  • Liberal Theory:
    • The liberal perspective posits that civil rights form the bedrock of citizenship, centering around the concept of individualism.
    • Citizenship, as per this theory, is a legal status that bestows specific rights upon individuals, safeguarding them from state interference.
    • T. H. Marshall, in his seminal work “Citizenship and Social Class” published in 1950, charts the evolution of citizenship in Britain. Marshall identifies three elements of citizenship – civil, political, and social
    • Although liberal citizenship ensures formal legal equality, substantive equality remains elusive, with critics pointing out persistent inequalities based on factors like caste, class, race, and gender.
      Various theories on citizenship
  • Republican Theory: The Republican tradition emphasizes civic self-rule achieved through citizen participation. Rousseau, in “The Social Contract,” contends that citizens attain freedom and laws gain legitimacy through the co-authoring of laws based on the general will.
    • Active engagement in deliberation and policymaking is advocated by republicans, contrasting with liberals who rely on the protection of citizenship through law.
    • While liberals prefer representative democracy, republicans champion deliberative democracy. Republicans assert that citizenship should be viewed as a shared civic identity moulded by a common public culture. Civic identity, according to this perspective, can unite citizens as long as it surpasses other identities like religion and ethnicity.
    • Despite these ideals, ensuring widespread citizen participation becomes challenging in the context of modern nation-states’ scale and complexity.
  • Libertarian Theory: The libertarian perspective traces its roots to the British Conservative government under Margaret Thatcher in 1979, prioritizing market rights over social rights.
    • Libertarians argue that individuals pursue their values and preferences through private activities rather than relying on public redistribution. Citizenship, in this view, emerges from free choices and contracts among individuals, with the market society serving as the foundation.
    • Robert Nozick is a prominent proponent of libertarian theory, emphasizing “entrepreneurial freedom” and the freedom to earn and own property.
    • Critics argue that market-based individualism lacks a robust foundation for social solidarity.
  • Communitarian Theory: Communitarians challenge liberals for neglecting the social nature of individuals and focusing excessively on individual rights. They argue that individuals exist within a community and stress the importance of duties and responsibilities towards the community.
    • Unlike liberals who prioritize individual rights, communitarians highlight the significance of group rights. Critics argue that communitarian citizenship may only be suitable for small, homogeneous societies with shared traditions.
    • The discussion extends to the intersection of citizenship and multiculturalism, especially in the context of modern societies increasingly recognized as multicultural due to globalization.
    • Critics of the liberal understanding of citizenship, which centers on the individual, contend that specific contexts like culture, religion, ethnicity, and language should be the determining factors of citizenship.
    • Will Kymlicka, in his book “Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights,” argues for “collective rights” for minority cultures consistent with liberal democratic principles.
  • Marxist Theory : According to the Marxist perspective, citizenship rights are a byproduct of class conflict. The existence of economically weaker sections poses a challenge to achieving equality before the law, as these sections struggle to exercise their citizenship rights due to the dominance of economically powerful classes.
    • Marxists believe that in a communist state, where the state is expected to wither away, the concept of citizenship itself is temporary. However, historical practices differ, with Lenin abolishing the terms ‘state’ and ‘citizen,’ and Stalin later restoring them in 1936, outlining rights and duties for individuals.
    • Anthony Giddens revisits the Marxist perspective, suggesting that modern democracy and citizenship began evolving in the 16th century as the state expanded its administrative power and engaged citizens in cooperative social relations. Giddens argues for the maintenance of citizenship rights within a liberal framework.
  • Pluralist Theory: The pluralist perspective views the development of citizenship as a multi-dimensional and complex process, attributing its evolution to a diverse set of factors. Citizenship, according to this theory, involves a reciprocal relationship between the individual and the community.
    • Pluralist theory, articulated by David Held, insists on examining all forms of discrimination, including gender, race, religion, property, education, occupation, or age.
    • In the contemporary world, numerous social movements, such as feminist, black, religious reform, workers’, children’s rights, dalit, adivasi, and ecological movements, address various forms of social discrimination. Pluralist theory recommends analyzing the issue of citizenship within the context of these movements.
  • Feminist Perspective: Feminists argue that women worldwide are treated as second-class citizens due to male dominance across civil, political, cultural, economic, and social spheres.
    • Women’s lower levels of political participation and representation underscore this inequality. Feminists challenge the distinction between public (political participation) and private (domestic) spheres, asserting that it perpetuates male dominance at the expense of women’s rights.
    • In the 1970s, the women’s movement slogan “The Personal is Political” emphasized the interconnectedness of personal and political spheres. J.S. Mill’s call for an egalitarian family is endorsed by liberals aiming for constitutional reforms to address gender-based inequalities, known as civic feminism.
    • Socialist feminists advocate for expanded areas like free birth control, abortion, health facilities, and state recognition of domestic labor.
    • Radical feminists push for women’s entry into the public sphere for active citizenship.
  • Gandhi’s Views: Gandhi’s views on citizenship centre on the notions of common good and active citizenship. He challenges the centralized power of the state, advocating for a decentralized state based on the principles of dharma (moral law and duty), ahimsa (non-violence in thought and deed), and satya (truth and sincerity).
    • Gandhi places great trust in the individual’s resistance against state coercion and envisions an ideal non-violent state that is self-governing, self-sufficient, and upholds majority rule with respect for minority rights.
    • Gandhi emphasizes the indivisibility of freedom and envisions citizens of the world, encouraging individuals to think locally and act globally, acknowledging that every global struggle is a personal one.

Reference: Static Portion


Related Blogs…


Frequently Asked Questions:

1. Question: Define the term “ethnic movement” and provide an example from India.

Answer: An ethnic movement refers to a collective effort by a group sharing common cultural, linguistic, or religious traits, seeking to assert their identity and rights; an example from India is the Khalistan Movement in Punjab.

2. Question: Identify the main objectives behind the Gorkhaland ethnic movement.

Answer: The Gorkhaland ethnic movement primarily seeks to establish a separate state for India’s Nepali-speaking population in the Darjeeling region, advocating for linguistic and cultural recognition and political autonomy.

3. Question: What was the Operation Blue Star, and which ethnic movement was it related to?
Answer: Operation Blue Star was a military action in 1984, aiming to remove Sikh militants hiding in the Golden Temple in Amritsar; it is related to the Khalistan movement, which sought a separate Sikh country.

4. Question: Mention a critical factor that triggered the emergence of ethnic movements in India, as discussed by Dipankar Gupta.
Answer: Dipankar Gupta emphasized that ethnicity is fundamentally a political process, wherein caste and religion, the key components of identity formation, are politicized by leaders for vested interests.

5. Question: What were the primary reasons for the Assam Ethnicity conflicts involving Bodo tribals and Bengali Muslim settlers?
Answer: The Assam Ethnicity conflicts primarily stemmed from issues related to immigration, land rights, and resource allocation, leading to clashes, riots, and evolving relationships among indigenous communities to address challenges.

6. Question: Briefly describe the role of the Dravidian Movement in terms of caste and societal structure.
Answer: The Dravidian Movement, led notably by E.V. Ramasamy, aimed to establish an egalitarian society, focusing on anti-Brahmanism and advocating for equal rights for backward castes, while also introducing reforms like self-respect marriages.

7. Question: Name the prominent ethnic movements in North-East India and specify one common objective.
Answer: Prominent ethnic movements in North-East India include the Nagas’ and Mizos’ struggles; a common objective was to gain autonomy and recognition for their distinct tribal identities and cultural uniqueness.

8. Question: What is the key argument of Gail Omveldt regarding traditional Indian society and multiculturalism?
Answer: Gail Omveldt opposed romanticizing traditional Indian society, arguing that hierarchy has always dominated it and dismissing the notion that multiculturalism is an intrinsic feature of Indian society as a myth.

9. Question: Briefly explain the social hierarchy factor as a contributing element to ethnic movements as suggested by Olzak.
Answer: Olzak suggests that the construction of hierarchies among ethnic communities, which often leads to the suppression of one group by another, is a key factor that can instigate social and ethnic movements.

10. Question: Identify one consequence of the unequal economic development factor within the context of ethnic movements in India.
Answer: One consequence of unequal economic development is the marginalization and underdevelopment of certain groups, leading to feelings of alienation and sometimes initiating ethnic movements as these groups strive for equality and recognition.


GS Related Practices Questions… 

To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Optional Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Optional Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Optional Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques.

META TAGS:

Ethnic Movements, ethnic movements in india, ethnic movement in sociology, Punjab Movement, North-East Ethnic Movements, Gorkhaland Movement, Dravidian Movement, Assam Ethnicity, Ethnic Conflicts, Sociopolitical Impact, India, Ethnic Consciousness, Ethnic Rights, Political Crisis, Economic Development, Cultural Disparities, Khalistan Movement, Nagaland, Mizoram, Multiculturalism, Political Economy, Identity Formation, Social Hierarchies, Bodo Tribals, Bengali Muslim Settlers, Anti-Sikh Riots, Operation Blue Star, Unequal Development, Ethnic Violence, Political Mobilization


Why Vikash Ranjan’s Classes for Sociology?

Proper guidance and assistance are required to learn the skill of interlinking current happenings with the conventional topics. VIKASH RANJAN SIR at TRIUMPH IAS guides students according to the Recent Trends of UPSC, making him the Best Sociology Teacher for Sociology Optional UPSC.

At Triumph IAS, the Best Sociology Optional Coaching platform, we not only provide the best study material and applied classes for Sociology for IAS but also conduct regular assignments and class tests to assess candidates’ writing skills and understanding of the subject.

Choose The Best Sociology Optional Teacher for IAS Preparation?

At the beginning of the journey for Civil Services Examination preparation, many students face a pivotal decision – selecting their optional subject. Questions such as “which optional subject is the best?” and “which optional subject is the most scoring?” frequently come to mind. Choosing the right optional subject, like choosing the best sociology optional teacher, is a subjective yet vital step that requires a thoughtful decision based on facts. A misstep in this crucial decision can indeed prove disastrous.

Ever since the exam pattern was revamped in 2013, the UPSC has eliminated the need for a second optional subject. Now, candidates have to choose only one optional subject for the UPSC Mains, which has two papers of 250 marks each. One of the compelling choices for many has been the sociology optional. However, it’s strongly advised to decide on your optional subject for mains well ahead of time to get sufficient time to complete the syllabus. After all, most students score similarly in General Studies Papers; it’s the score in the optional subject & essay that contributes significantly to the final selection.

A sound strategy does not rely solely on the popular
Opinion of toppers or famous YouTubers cum teachers.

It requires understanding one’s ability, interest, and the relevance of the subject, not just for the exam but also for life in general. Hence, when selecting the best sociology teacher, one must consider the usefulness of sociology optional coaching in General Studies, Essay, and Personality Test.

The choice of the optional subject should be based on objective criteria, such as the nature, scope, and size of the syllabus, uniformity and stability in the question pattern, relevance of the syllabic content in daily life in society, and the availability of study material and guidance. For example, choosing the best sociology optional coaching can ensure access to top-quality study materials and experienced teachers. Always remember, the approach of the UPSC optional subject differs from your academic studies of subjects. Therefore, before settling for sociology optional, you need to analyze the syllabus, previous years’ pattern, subject requirements (be it ideal, visionary, numerical, conceptual theoretical), and your comfort level with the subject.

This decision marks a critical point in your UPSC – CSE journey, potentially determining your success in a career in IAS/Civil Services. Therefore, it’s crucial to choose wisely, whether it’s the optional subject or the best sociology optional teacher. Always base your decision on accurate facts, and never let your emotional biases guide your choices. After all, the search for the best sociology optional coaching is about finding the perfect fit for your unique academic needs and aspirations.

To master these intricacies and fare well in the Sociology Optional Syllabus, aspiring sociologists might benefit from guidance by the Best Sociology Optional Teacher and participation in the Best Sociology Optional Coaching. These avenues provide comprehensive assistance, ensuring a solid understanding of sociology’s diverse methodologies and techniques. Sociology, Social theory, Best Sociology Optional Teacher, Best Sociology Optional Coaching, Sociology Optional Syllabus.
Best Sociology Optional Teacher, Sociology Syllabus, Sociology Optional, Sociology Optional Coaching, Best Sociology Optional Coaching, Best Sociology Teacher, Sociology Course, Sociology Teacher, Sociology Foundation, Sociology Foundation Course, Sociology Optional UPSC, Sociology for IAS,

Follow us :

🔎 https://www.instagram.com/triumphias

🔎 www.triumphias.com

🔎https://www.youtube.com/c/TriumphIAS

🔎https://t.me/VikashRanjanSociology

Find More Blogs…

Compare and contrast Karl Marx’s and Max weber’s Karl Marx- Historical Materialism
Talcott Parsons : Social system Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences

KEYWORD:Various theories on citizenship,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,Various theories on citizenship ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *