When considering the array of 51 optional subjects for the UPSC Mains Examination, Sociology consistently stands out as a top choice. Its inherent appeal lies in its accessibility and intriguing exploration of humanity and society, catering even to students from Science and Commerce backgrounds. With a well-defined UPSC sociology syllabus comprising only 13 units, Sociology can be comprehensively covered within 5 to 6 Month Comprehensive “Foundation to Finale” Classroom Programme, Many of Our Sociology Foundation Course Students have Cleared CSE 2023- Kajal Singh, First Attempt (Age 22) Mahi Sharma, First Mains (Age 23), Anand Sharma First Mains and Many Others. Previously also Many students like IAS Pradeep Singh, IAS Ashish, IPS Bindu Madhav, IPS Aparna Gautam, IPS Shahnaz Illyas got Success in CSE in First Attempt with Sociology Optional.

IAS Medha Anand, has get 310 marks in her optional subject sociology, 156 in paper – 1 &  154 marks in Paper -2 in CSE 2023. Notably, Sociology for UPSC has garnered a reputation as one of the Highest scoring optional subjects in the UPSC Main Examination, with numerous candidates consistently achieving 300+. Its popularity is evident in the fact that a significant proportion of top 100 rankers opt for Sociology as their optional subject, showcasing its high scoring potential, particularly for those not from sociology backgrounds. Moreover, relevance of Sociology Optional Syllabus for UPSC extends beyond the examination hall, enriching understanding across various aspects of life, from social and economic to political and cultural domains. In recent times, Sociology Optional has gained traction, aligning with the evolving trend of the UPSC Mains towards conceptual analysis. Unlike other optional subjects with unpredictable question patterns, Sociology offers stability and predictability, making it an attractive choice. This adaptability, coupled with its concise syllabus and relevance to both academic and social spheres, positions Sociology as the ideal optional subject for engineers as well as optional subject for commerce graduates and optional subject for  science graduates seeking success in the Civil Services Examination. For those pursuing Sociology as an optional subject, accessing comprehensive Sociology optional notes and few good Sociology optional books, and previous years’ UPSC sociology optional question papers is pivotal for thorough preparation. Additionally, for aspirants seeking guidance, renowned  educator Vikash Ranjan Sir at TRIUMPH IAS coaching institutes in Delhi, offer valuable support and resources. Vikash Ranjan Sir is the Best Sociology Teacher and Triumph IAS is the
best sociology coaching in Delhi. If you are away from Old Rajendra Nagar, Delhi, you can still complete Journey of UPSC civil service preparation through online Sociology class The  scientific nature of Sociology, coupled with its direct applicability to daily social interactions, renders it a subject that can be comprehended without extensive reference materials, distinguishing it from other optional subjects requiring extensive reading and research.

Suo moto powers of supreme court

• In legal terms, “suo moto cognizance” refers to the authority of a court to initiate legal proceedings on its own, without the need for a formal complaint or petition from any party. This process is triggered by information the court obtains from media reports, letters, or other reliable sources.
• Under Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, both the Supreme Court and High Courts in India have the power to take suo moto cognizance of cases. Article 32 empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights, while Article 226 grants similar powers to High Courts within their respective jurisdictions.
• Suo moto cognizance is often associated with Public Interest Litigation (PIL), a procedure that allows individuals or social activists to approach the court in matters of public interest. This concept has broadened the judiciary’s role in addressing issues of social justice and public concern.
• Suo moto cognizance is considered an example of judicial activism, where judges take proactive steps to address urgent issues that might otherwise be overlooked. By initiating such cases, courts aim to ensure the swift and effective administration of justice. While courts usually require a petition from an aggrieved party, they sometimes take suo moto cognizance to correct improper orders or address injustices.

Instances where suo moto can be applied-

• Contempt of Court: Courts may take suo moto cognizance in cases of contempt, which include intentional disobedience of court orders or actions that undermine the authority and dignity of the court.
• Reopening of Old Cases: If new and substantial evidence comes to light, the court may exercise suo moto cognizance to reopen a previously closed case.
• Order Probes for New Cases: Courts may initiate investigations or order inquiries based on information from affected individuals or media reports, particularly in instances where there appears to be an injustice against an individual or a group.
• Protection of Fundamental Rights: Suo moto cognizance can be employed when a citizen’s fundamental rights are at risk or have been violated.
• Matters of Public Interest: The court may intervene in situations that impact a large segment of society or involve significant public interest.

Negative aspects of Suo Moto

Jurisdictional Overlap: Courts have the power to take suo moto cognizance of cases already under consideration by other courts or institutions. This can lead to confusion, as different courts may adopt varying strategies and timelines to address the same issue. Overlapping jurisdiction may result in conflicting rulings and delays in resolving the matter.

Political Sensitivity: Courts may exercise suo moto cognizance in politically sensitive cases, which can raise concerns about judicial overreach. Such actions might be perceived as an attempt to influence the political landscape, potentially undermining public trust in the judiciary’s independence and impartiality.

Misuse of Judicial Resources: The inappropriate use of suo moto cognizance can lead to the inefficient allocation of judicial resources. Courts may end up dealing with issues that could be more effectively managed through administrative or existing legal channels. This misallocation can hinder the judiciary’s ability to address other urgent and important matters.

Impact on Specialized Bodies: When courts take up matters already being handled by specialized administrative bodies or tribunals, it can disrupt their operations. These administrative entities often possess the expertise and experience needed to manage specific issues efficiently. Court intervention may disrupt their well-organized procedures, leading to delays and confusion.

The End of the Blog: Suo moto powers of supreme court