{"id":8873,"date":"2020-07-07T19:11:35","date_gmt":"2020-07-07T13:41:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/?p=8873"},"modified":"2020-07-07T19:11:35","modified_gmt":"2020-07-07T13:41:35","slug":"economic-theory-applied-to-religion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/economic-theory-applied-to-religion\/","title":{"rendered":"ECONOMIC THEORY APPLIED TO RELIGION"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 class=\"title\" data-type=\"title\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Relevance: Sociology: Paper I: Religion and society<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"import-auto-id1169034206445\">How do people decide which religion to follow, if any? How does one pick a church or decide which denomination \u201cfits\u201d best?<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Rational choice theory (RCT)<\/strong><\/span> is one way <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>social scientists have attempted to explain<\/strong> <\/span>these behaviors. The theory proposes that people are self-interested, though not necessarily selfish, and that people make rational choices\u2014choices that can reasonably be expected to maximize positive outcomes while minimizing negative outcomes.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Sociologists<\/strong><\/span> Roger Finke and Rodney Stark (1988) first considered the use of RCT to explain some aspects of religious behavior, with the assumption that there is a basic human need for religion in terms of providing belief in a supernatural being, a sense of meaning in life, and belief in life after death.<\/p>\n<p>Religious explanations of these concepts are presumed to be more satisfactory than scientific explanations, which may help to account for the continuation of strong religious connectedness in countries such as the United States, despite predictions of some competing theories for a great decline in religious affiliation due to modernization and religious pluralism.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.slideplayer.com\/37\/10694880\/slides\/slide_5.jpg\" alt=\"Religion. Religion and Society \uf06f Religion \u2013 a unified system of ...\" \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"import-auto-id1169034197133\">Another assumption of RCT is that religious organizations can be viewed in terms of \u201ccosts\u201d and \u201crewards.\u201d Costs are not only monetary requirements, but are also the time, effort, and commitment demands of any particular religious organization. Rewards are the intangible benefits in terms of belief and satisfactory explanations about life, death, and the supernatural, as well as social rewards from membership.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/slideplayer.com\/slide\/4487244\/14\/images\/29\/Criticisms+of+Rational+Choice+Analysis.jpg\" alt=\"Week 10. Interaction and Confrontation bet - ppt download\" \/><\/p>\n<p>RCT proposes that, in a pluralistic society with many religious options, religious organizations will compete for members, and people will choose between different churches or denominations in much the same way they select other consumer goods, balancing costs and rewards in a rational manner. In this framework, RCT also explains the development and decline of churches, denominations, sects, and even cults; this limited part of the very complex RCT theory is the only aspect well supported by research data.<\/p>\n<p id=\"import-auto-id1169034205898\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\"><strong>Critics of RCT argue that it doesn\u2019t fit well with human spiritual needs, and many sociologists disagree that the costs and rewards of religion can even be meaningfully measured or that individuals use a rational balancing process regarding religious affiliation. <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The theory doesn\u2019t address many aspects of religion that individuals may consider essential (such as faith) and further fails to account for agnostics and atheists who don\u2019t seem to have a similar need for religious explanations.<\/p>\n<p>Critics also believe this theory overuses economic terminology and structure and point out that terms such as \u201crational\u201d and \u201creward\u201d are unacceptably defined by their use; they would argue that the theory is based on faulty logic and lacks external, empirical support.<\/p>\n<p>A scientific explanation for\u00a0<em data-effect=\"italics\">why<\/em>\u00a0something occurs can\u2019t reasonably be supported by the fact that it\u00a0<em data-effect=\"italics\">does<\/em>\u00a0occur. RCT is widely used in economics and to a lesser extent in criminal justice, but the application of RCT in explaining the religious beliefs and behaviors of people and societies is still being debated in sociology today.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>For more such notes, Articles, News &amp; Views Join our Telegram Channel.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Telegram Link\" href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/triumphias\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>https:\/\/t.me\/triumphias<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Click the link below to see the details about the UPSC \u2013Civils courses offered by Triumph IAS.<\/strong> <\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong><a style=\"color: #ff0000;\" title=\"Courses available\" href=\"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/pages-all-courses.php\">https:\/\/triumphias.com\/pages-all-courses.php<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relevance: Sociology: Paper I: Religion and society Introduction How do people decide which religion to follow, if any? How does<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6643,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[114,115],"tags":[392],"class_list":["post-8873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sociology-optional","category-sociology-optional-paper-i","tag-union-public-service-commission-upsc"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8873"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8874,"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8873\/revisions\/8874"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6643"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}