{"id":7819,"date":"2020-05-08T18:33:33","date_gmt":"2020-05-08T13:03:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/?p=7819"},"modified":"2023-04-10T15:45:03","modified_gmt":"2023-04-10T10:15:03","slug":"post-covid-19-the-need-of-universal-basic-income","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/triumphias.com\/blog\/post-covid-19-the-need-of-universal-basic-income\/","title":{"rendered":"Post COVID-19 & the need of universal basic income"},"content":{"rendered":"

Post COVID-19 & the need of universal basic income<\/h1>\n

Relevance: <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

G.S paper II:<\/span> Governance:\u00a0Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation. \u2022 Development processes and the development industry- the role of NGOs, SHGs, various groups and associations, donors, charities, institutional and other stakeholders \u2022 Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States and the performance of these schemes; mechanisms, laws, institutions and Bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of these vulnerable sections. \u2022 Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector\/Services relating to Health, Education, Human Resources. \u2022 Issues relating to poverty and hunger & <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

G.S paper III: Indian Economy<\/span> &<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Sociology:\u00a0<\/span>Social Changes in India:\u00a0(i) Visions of Social Change in India:\u00a0(a) Idea of development planning and mixed economy. (b) Constitution, law and social change. (c) Education and social change. (ii) Rural and Agrarian transformation in India: (a) Programmes of rural development, Community Development Programme, cooperatives, poverty alleviation schemes;\u00a0Challenges of Social Transformation:\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>(a) Crisis of development: displacement, environmental problems and sustainability.\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>(b) Poverty, deprivation and inequalities.\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\"What<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

INTRODUCTION<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Without much larger injections of cash, we would still be facing a reduction in aggregate demand and an inevitable recession<\/p>\n

Capitalism isn\u2019t working. We need a Universal Basic Income as we come out of the coronavirus lockdown into the economic \u2014 and the climate \u2014 crisis.<\/p>\n

The furlough scheme was an extraordinary move from a Conservative government and an essential underpinning for the incomes of millions of people.<\/p>\n

ANALYSIS<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The suggestion that British people have become addicted to the scheme is offensive to those who face destitution without it, but it also ignores the fact that furlough is under the control of employers not workers, and those running businesses are as desperate to reboot the economy \u2014 safely \u2014 as the chancellor is.<\/p>\n

\"Insights<\/p>\n

India is through the first emergency so what next?<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

What the government needs is to provide a financial safety-net for everybody in the country over the coming months and years as the labour-market and the economy continue to be turbulent and unpredictable.<\/p>\n

Obliged<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\"Universal<\/p>\n

The obvious answer is the long-standing Green policy of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) scheme. It would provide each individual with an income sufficient to meet their basic needs with additional payments to cover housing costs for those in rented accommodation and for the disabled.<\/p>\n

Demands for UBI have become louder during the crisis, with a parliamentary Early Day Motion gaining support from nearly 100 MPs.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Such a policy would have more effectively underpinned the lives of citizens than the complex system of schemes devised by the chancellor. And it is those who have slipped through his net who are the best argument for a basic income beyond the crisis.<\/p>\n

Both Labour and Conservative parties have resisted this policy, because they are both wedded to the wage-labour system that lies at the heart of a capitalist economy.<\/p>\n

Admittedly from opposite sides: one from the side of labour one from the side of capital. But neither has the courage to challenge the fundamental law of the capitalist system that every citizen is morally obliged to work.<\/p>\n

Insecure<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

This 19th-century mindset is blocking support for a policy that would offer the flexibility we need to respond to this economic calamity.<\/p>\n

A government that accuses those who are trying to feed their families of being addicted to handouts will probably also fear that a temporary basic income scheme might become permanent and turn us into a nation of scroungers.<\/p>\n

Recent research from Finland shows that this is far from the case. A two-year study found that those in receipt of the benefit enjoyed greater financial security and mental health but there was no disincentive to work.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In fact, without the fear of losing benefits, they were more able to take flexible but insecure opportunities.<\/p>\n

But a basic income would only provide fundamental security and would leave most people on lower incomes than they enjoyed before the crisis.<\/p>\n

\"Universal<\/p>\n

Crisis<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Without much larger injections of cash, we would still be facing a reduction in aggregate demand and an inevitable recession.<\/p>\n

Alongside UBI we need a massive programme of public investment, again a longstanding Green Party policy called the Green New Deal.<\/p>\n

This would kickstart investment in green infrastructure, electrifying our railways, retrofitting our homes, and converting space heating from gas to electricity.<\/p>\n

It would create well-paid, skilled jobs in all our local economies. A Green New Deal would mean that we come out of the coronavirus crisis much better prepared for the bigger, and more fundamental, climate crisis.<\/p>\n

How we fund this Green New Deal will determine how successful it is in achieving equality as well as sustainability.<\/p>\n

Industries<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

A significant proportion of emergency coronavirus\u00a0investment\u00a0should be funded through direct money creation by the Bank of England, or QE.<\/p>\n

Massive and essential public investment to protect citizens during a public health crisis should not become a burden on future generations.<\/p>\n

However, the money created through QE must come with climate and sustainability conditions.<\/p>\n

This would ensure that the emergency economic package not only deals with the current crisis but also helps to build resilience for the longer and deeper climate crisis we will still be facing once the virus has left us.<\/p>\n

Economic recovery will require a government much more engaged in industrial and regional policy, deciding which industries we should be subsidised and where they should be situated.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Prepared<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n